Showing posts with label Staton case. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Staton case. Show all posts

Friday, March 27, 2009

STATON CASE CLOSED

Nebraska's biggest and most famious "safe haven" case is "officially" closed.

Yesterday, Gary Staton, 36, appeared before Douglas County Juvenile Court judge Elizabeth Crnkovich to settle guardianship of his two oldest sons, 16 and 17, "safe havened" last September at Creighton University Hospital during the Nebraska Fiasco. Crnkovich, who has worked with the family for the last six months, did not terminate Staton's parental rights, but appointed unnamed legal guardians for the boys " who are currently in foster care and attending high school together. Calling the Statons a "good family" Crnkovich told Gary Staton, "I've worked with you a long time and through that have known the challenges and have known the circumstances that brought us to this place... What you've done today, oddly enough is very generous."

On March 12, Staton voluntarily terminated parental rights to his seven youngest children, "safe havened" at the same time. Those children are currently living with his late wife's aunt in Lincoln. According to Action 3 News Omaha, she plans to adopt them.

After the hearing Action 3 decided to stalk Staton, forcing him to sneak out down the backstairs of his new house without comment. A reporter, however, managed to nail Staton's father-in-law, Jack Manzer, who said the kids are in school, making new friends, and doing OK.

"Any hard feelings toward Gary? I'd like if things would have come out better, but no he's their father and that's just the way it is."

If anything good came out of this case at all, it's that the Statons have been able to stay together, more or less, though I can't even imagine to begin to know how these kids feel.

I'll include additional details if they come out tomorrow.

In the meantime, still no expected newborns thrown into the maw.

Monday, September 29, 2008

"I DON'T WANT ANYTHING TO HAPPEN TO KIDS LIKE IT HAPPENED TO ME," NEBRASKA ABANDONMENTS REACH 16

The casualties pile up in Nebraska.

According to Nebraska DHHS figures released a couple days ago, on September 24, the same day that 9 siblings were dumped at Creighton Medical Center, an 11 year old boy was kicked to the curb in "Burt/Douglas County" and a news report indicates another boy, 15, was dropped off in Omaha (video). On Sept. 22, an 18 year old "safe havened" himself at a Grand Island hospital. That answers one question some of us had!

DHHS apparently won't count the boy left with the police on September 1, since police stations are not "safe haven" drop-off points.

Here's the tally to date:

September 1: Male 14--left by mother at Omaha police station. Currently in foster care.

September 13: Male 11--left by grandmother--another report says mother--at Immanuel Medical Center, Omaha; currently in foster care and partial hospitalization.

September 13: Male 15--left by guardian aunt at Bryant Medical Center West, Lincoln.

September 20: Pregnant female 13 left by mother at Immanuel Medical Center, Omaha. Returned to mother--see below.

September 22: Male 18, turned himself in to hospital in Grand Island; too old for foster care, but can receive services.

September 24: 9 siblings, 1-17 (left by father, Gary Staton, at Creighton University Medical Center ER).

  • female, 1
  • male, 6
  • male, 7
  • female, 9
  • male, 11
  • female 13
  • female 14,
  • male, 15
  • male 17

    An 18-year old sister who does not live at home was not abandoned. All these children are now in foster care and several relatives have requested custody Background checks are underway here and here. Go here and here for video of home and neighbors.

September 24: Male 11--left at Immanuel Medical Center, Omaha.

September 24, Male 15--left by guardian uncle at Immanuel Medical Center, Omaha; uncle plans to relinquish guardianship.

TOTAL: 16

Today's Omaha World-Herald has compiled data on the dumpees in the aggregate. I don't know if this data includes off-brand or late dumps.

Some facts about the children:
9 (ages 1 to 17) were from one family. The rest, ages 11 to 15, were dropped off singly.

10 had one dead parent.

1 was orphaned.

4 were being raised by relatives other than parents.

3 have been diagnosed with severe mental or emotional disorders.

While Nebraska's children are "legally" dumped by their parents at an alarming rate under this Draconian law, state legislators sit on their thumbs discounting and ignoring the damage to Nebraska children, families, and communities. In fact, a scan through of the numerous articles and blogs generated in the last couple days, tell us that leggies and their groupies believe that child abandonment is as grand idea as ipods and Blackberrys. (Ill write more about that in the next day or two. I'm traveling tomorrow).

Rep. Ray Aguilar who earlier said:

It does bring light that there are situations out there where people have no other alternatives, and it is probably a good situation that they could take advantage of this

has shown unconscionable and total contempt for Nebraska children, citizens, best practice social welfare...and the state's reputation (you'd think he'd care about at least one). He told KHAS-TV (download the video for the full affect):

It is something we can wait for quite frankly. Because if this is reported well enough and people understand this is not the proper method for them to take and find out what the other avenues that are available to them then maybe this whole thing goes away.

In other words, it is entirely appropriate for the state to encourage child abandonment.

What kind of a rabbit hole have we dropped in to?

To add absurdity on top of absurdity, DHHS now places the blame for "legal" child abandonment on "irresponsible," deadbeat and lazy parents for following the letter of Nebraska's "unique" child dump law, which the state has been bragging about and urging Nebraskans to use since the day it became law.

Today's Omaha World-Herald, offers this nugget (emphasis mine):

Leaders at the Nebraska Department of Health and Human Services say the cases raise no concerns about problems within the [social welfare] system.

The parents simply decided they did not want to continue on this journey with their kids," said Todd Landry, children and family services director.

He said he doesn't want to minimize the challenges the families face, but said taking a child to a hospital is not the way to deal with those challenges.

The department's initial review of the cases has not turned up problems with the state's system for responding to families in crisis, he said.

He said there has been no indication that the families had been hit by economic troubles, and said most of the children have been covered by the state Medicaid program, which could pay for services.

Apparently, Todd was too busy pointing fingers to catch the news:

Gary Staton on abandoning his 9 kids: "I was with her [deceased wife] for 17 years, and then she was gone. What was I going to do?...We raised them together. I didn't think I could do it alone. I fell apart. I couldn't take care of them."...Staton said he was overwhelmed by his family responsibilities and had to quit his job. He said he couldn't pay the rent or utilities."I was able to get the kids to a safe place before they were homeless," he said.

or to notice that just because a benefit is available, it doesn't mean that it's accessible. (See the Herald-World article, for a rundown of Nebraska's lousy delivery system that leaves the social service needy hanging on the clothes line.)

Landry goes on:

"It's been less an issue of knowing where to turn and more of an issue of 'I simply don't want to do this job,'" he said.

Three parents and guardians said they received information about the law from professionals within the system: a therapist, a hospital social worker and a staff member with a county attorney's office.

Apparently these "professionals" think it's OK to kick around and abandon some of the most vulnerable amongst us: scared, pregnant emotionally, and mentally disordered kids. In no article I've read has there been any indication that the parents and guardians of these dumped kids were lazy deadbeats or irresponsible. They had come to the end of their tether dealing with deeply troubled children--sometimes mentally ill--teens as well as poverty, and had received little or no assistance from the broken child welfare system that claims to be there for them. None understand what a so-called "safe haven" is and were seemingly led to believe that it's a Time Out button to push when the weight of parenthood gets them down. None ,whom I've read about, had any intention of severing ties permanently with their children. They did not want to relinquish parental rights, they did not want their children adopted. They merely wanted help and were told by professionals and state-paid authority figures that the only way they could get help for their kids was to abandon them. If this makes no sense, don't worry. It doesn't.

Todd Landry and the state agency he represents, can't have it both ways. The legislature created this travesty. Politicians and the state advertised to the public that anyone can dump their kid or anybody else's kid at a hospital. But when parents take their wise advise, they're called lazy and irresponsible...or worse.

The harm the Nebraska legislature has caused to Nebraska's children and families nationwide is immense. Families have been destroyed, friendships, neighborhoods, and schools damaged. 17 kids (not including the DYS), who would have remained within their families have been legally abandoned to the long arm of the state. Trust has been broken. Abandonment is one of the worse acts that can be perpetrated against another. I cannot begin to imagine how these dumpees feel stripped of their families, homes, schools, friends, and parents. And now that the barn door is open we can expect to hear, "Watch it or it's off to Nebraska for you,"

In one regard we are fortunate. So far the hundreds of babies dumped into "safe haven" programs have been too young to articulate their anger and fear. Now we can hear the voices of the dumped and abandoned. The pregnant teen who was left at Omaha's Immanuel Hospital on September 20, has returned home. She, and her mother were interviewed by KMTV News. (video also). She told them:

I don't want anything to happen to kids like it happened to me."

See, child abandonment is so bad, even a kid gets it. Unfortunately, politicians don't.

SHAME ON NEBRASKA.

ADDENDA: As I was finishing this entry, I received a breakdown of cases. Go here to read details on 11 dumpees. (Some may not agree with other news reports.) These kids who have been dumped into the "safe haven" grinder have already suffered abuse, neglect, and abandonment from those they should trust most. Now they suffer more at the hands of the state.

Every child abandonment is a failure of the state.

SHAME ON NEBRASKA

SHAME





Friday, September 26, 2008

BUILD IT AND THEY WILL COME: NEBRASKA DUMP FIASCO!

NOTE: I am at, of all appropriate places, the annual NCFA conference in Washington. I've bailed out of the last 2 sessions to get something up about the Nebraska kid dump fiasco. I'm checking of the hotel later today, and will be back with more, and to add/fix some links and don't have time to add right now.

To date 14 children have been dumped into hospitals and police stations (not a legal dump spot) under Nebraska's "safe haven" law." None are newborns, the targeted "beneficiary" of such laws.The kids left in Nebraska "safe havens" have mostly been teenagers. On Wednesday, a father left off 9 siblings at the Creighton University Medical Center ER.

Here is a brief run-down.

BUILD IT AND THEY WILL COME
September 1: Boy 14 (left by Omaha police station)

September 13: Boy 11 ( left by grandmother (another report says mother) at Immanuel Medical Center, Omaha); Boy 15 (left by guardian aunt at Bryant Medical Center West, Lincoln)

September 20: Girl, 13 left by mother at Immanuel Medical Center Omaha)

September 24: 9 siblings, 1-17 (left by father at Creighton University Medical Center ER)

WHAT DID THEY EXPECT?
But...but....that's not what we meant!

Backpedaling Cornhusker politicians seem to forget what they passed:

Section 1. No person shall be prosecuted for any crime based solely upon the act of leaving a child in the custody of an employee on duty at a hospital licensed by the State of Nebraska. The hospital shall promptly contact appropriate authorities to take custody of the child.

According to Sen. Pete Persch in an August 15, 2008 article in stateline.org, the only way Nebraska "safe haven" pimps could get their bill passed was to expand the already crazy template of newborn abandonment to an even crazier law to legalize all child abandonment:

State Sen. Pete Pirsch, whose compromise amendment eventually became the law, said using the broad language was intentional, because several senators felt strongly that the safe haven protection needed to be extended to all children.

Unaware that language has consequences Pirsch continued to bray on:

In my opinion, the need to pass a safe haven bill outweighed the need for perfect language,” “The risk to babies’ lives far outweighed the possibility of a few inconvenient circumstances with older children.
WE ARE SHOCKED, I TELL YOU, SHOCKED!
Here's some stuttering quotes from the bozos who passed this law and are now scratching their heads.

Senator Ray Aguilar:
Teen mothers were hiding the fact that they were pregnant and there were situations where they would dump their baby off in a dumpster and the baby would die. That was the intent of the law; to try and protect against that.

And then he forward pedals:
It does bring light that there are situations out there where people have no other alternatives, and it is probably a good situation that they could take advantage of this.

Senator Lowen Kruse:
It is not designed for 11 year olds or 15 year olds. And the legislature is going to have to go back in and change that a bit.

Sen. Vickie McDonald:
We discussed the possibility of something like this happening, but we did nothing to address it thinking possibly it wouldn't happen.

Sen. Brad Ashford:
I would have expected an infant case, probably more than I would a 15-old. If it does save a child, then it's worth it obviously. this is a new law. I'm sure we will have some data on what happened in these two case(s) (sic) and then we'll have t watch it over the next several months to see if it raises to the level of abusing the system."

Sen. Tony Fulton:
If word gets out that you have an unruly children, or that when you have unruly children, you can just drop them off and be clear of any responsibility, that's a problem."

And, of course, the Nebraska law' sponsor Sen. Arnie Struthman:

This was never the intent of the bill.

and
People are leaving them off just because they can't control them They're probably in no real danger, so it's an easy way out for the caretaker.

We really opened a can of worms. We have a mess.

and
This is a situation that I felt could possibly be coming. I didn't realize it would happen this quick.

Voices for Children, the child advocacy organization that remained neutral on the safe haven bill, now claims they feared the Nebraska scenario:

Omaha World Herald: "This is what we feared," said Kathy Bigsby Moore, executive director for Voices for Children of Nebraska. "It appears this law has now created a new front door to the child welfare system."

When the bill went into effect, Sarah Ann Lewis, VFC's policy coordinator told the press:

We hope the intent of the law, which is to be in the best interest of children, is followed, but we're not sure whether or not this is the best-designed policy to do that," We'd rather see mothers use the services already in the community, like adoption or counseling, instead of abandonment."

Safe Haven advocates have remained suspiciously quiet. I understand Tom Atwood discussed the issue of teen dumping last week for Nebraska Public Radio, but so far I've been unable to find a reference to his appearance. Tracey Johnson of the National Safe Haven Alliance says "We don't endorse the way it was done." I have been unable to find any statements from big dump industrialists Tim Jacard, Dawn Geras, and the Morriseys.

NOW is absolutely now the time to demand repeal of "safe haven" laws in all 50 states. Nebraska politicians are talking about calling a special session to "tweak" their abomination. That's not good enough. Ditch this thing now.

Those of us who have opposed baby dumping from the start warned that this would happen. That newborns, under the paranoia of dumpster and death, would be the first and that the age of dumpees would scoot up. Some safe haven advocates have even feared the result of their own good deeds. LA County Supervisor Don Knobe, for instance, one of the strongest "safe haven" supporters in the country, has refused to support an increase in the age time frame of abandoned infants in California and even lobbying against an increase.

Since 1999, we have seen "safe haven" laws go from a supposedly "rare" emergency child custody law to a child welfare law, and now an unruly child law.

This needs to stop right now, and the best place to start is Nebraska.

Please go to Baby Love Child for a wonderful series of analytical articles on Nebraska.

Shame on Nebraska--When "we told you so" barely begins to scratch the surface

Nebraska Dump Law: Just how deep does this rabbit hole go?

Nebraska, 11 dumps in 24 hours